Google Add

Thursday, October 15, 2009

hiv rash


Measles, a viral infection characterized by a rash and malaise, can become a complicated case that involves meningitis (inflammation of the tissues surrounding the brain) or multi-organ involvement. Death can and does occur, luckily, no one has died of it in the United States. Still, about a quarter of a million children die from it in under-served parts of the world where vaccine and/or treatment for measles is not available.

You may be asking yourself what the big deal is about 131 cases in a country of over 300 million. The real answer is that 131 is likely an underestimate of the true number reported to the health departments all over the country. Other cases may go unrecognized. People who are immune-compromised or sick with other conditions may develop measles and not know it. They may die from it and not know it. Other than the rash, there are few other ways to recognize it beyond lab tests that may take too long or be to costly to perform. Also, because measles is so rare, few physicians may recognize it on symptoms alone.

The other reason why this is a big deal is that measles is perfectly vaccine preventable. In the United States of America, in 2008, there should be no cases of measles. Living for your faith and beliefs is one thing; dying because of them is another. The worst offenders in the non-vaccination campaign are misinformed individuals who, with all the evidence to the contrary in peer-reviewed study after peer-reviewed study, still believe that vaccines cause diseases like autism or auto-immune conditions. The truth to this is that they might cause something, but the overwhelming evidence is that they don't. So slacking on measles means that they have been slacking in other vaccines, and that's a scary proposition.

HIV/AIDS in Pakistan: the context and magnitude of an emerging threat


STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this review were to: (1) assess the nature and comprehensiveness of information regarding HIV/AIDS in Pakistan; (2) to evaluate the extent of HIV/AIDS in Pakistan by epidemiological estimates; (3) to indicate the implications of the results for health policy in Pakistan and other regions at a similar stage in the epidemic. DESIGN: A structured review of published, unpublished, and government literature was undertaken to collate all available information and present a descriptive epidemiological profile of HIV/AIDS in the country. SETTING: Pakistan, a developing country in the South Asian region. National and regional information and analysis are presented in so far as the data allowed. Sample sizes varied from 1.35 million people screened at the national level to smaller studies of fewer than 100 screened. RESULTS: Data pertaining to HIV/AIDS in Pakistan showed the best national estimates of HIV prevalence as 64 per 100,000 (0.064%). Within patients with sexually transmitted diseases the seroprevalence was as high as 6100 per 100,000 (6.1%); in men with extramarital contacts, 5400 per 100,000 (5.4%) and was as low as zero in some studied populations as well. The average age of onset was reported as 30 years. It is estimated that if all incident cases of AIDS were to die, there would be at least 5000 deaths annually attributable to HIV/AIDS. CONCLUSION: Coupled with the extremely low awareness of HIV/AIDS in Pakistan, as well as growing number of cases, the AIDS epidemic is poised to take a hold in Pakistan. The presence of additional risk factors such as unscreened blood, and low condom use rates make the situation fertile for AIDS to become a major public health issue. Pakistan's health policy must be proactive in tackling this emerging health threat.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

skip to main | skip to sidebar HIV AIDS


Main article: Origin of AIDSAIDS was first reported June 5, 1981, when the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recorded a cluster of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (now still classified as PCP but known to be caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii) in five homosexual men in Los Angeles.[138] In the beginning, the CDC did not have an official name for the disease, often referring to it by way of the diseases that were associated with it, for example, lymphadenopathy, the disease after which the discoverers of HIV originally named the virus.[70][71] They also used Kaposi's Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections, the name by which a task force had been set up in 1981.[139] In the general press, the term GRID, which stood for Gay-related immune deficiency, had been coined.[140] The CDC, in search of a name, and looking at the infected communities coined “the 4H disease,” as it seemed to single out Haitians, homosexuals, hemophiliacs, and heroin users.[141] However, after determining that AIDS was not isolated to the homosexual community,[139] the term GRID became misleading and AIDS was introduced at a meeting in July 1982.[142] By September 1982 the CDC started using the name AIDS, and properly defined the illness.[143]A more controversial theory known as the OPV AIDS hypothesis suggests that the AIDS epidemic was inadvertently started in the late 1950s in the Belgian Congo by Hilary Koprowski's research into a poliomyelitis vaccine.[144][145] According to scientific consensus, this scenario is not supported by the available evidence.[146][147][148]A recent study states that HIV probably moved from Africa to Haiti and then entered the United States around 1969.[149

Why Aids is Worse in africa


Photo by Getty Images
By Anthony RuthPublished: May 22, 2007
As an economics student at Harvard, Emily Oster couldn’t figure out why no one in her field was working on HIV/AIDS—particularly what’s causing the epidemic in Africa—so she took up the topic herself. Now a research fellow at the Becker Center on Chicago Price Theory, she’s gottenAfricans are four to five times more likely to contract HIV from unprotected intercourse with an HIV-positive person. Oster attributes this to higher instances of bacterial and viral STDs in Africans—nearly half carry the herpes virus—which make them more susceptible to HIV.
Finally, Oster used death rates to estimate the prevalence of AIDS in the general African population. She found that the popular UN estimates of African AIDS cases, which are based on tests of pregnant women at prenatal clinics, are about three times too high. However, Oster says, the news is not as good as it sounds. “My study, which estimated changes in the infection rate over time, also drew a second, chilling conclusion: In Africa, HIV is spreading as quickly as ever.”
In addition to the December Esquire article, Oster’s research on AIDS was featured in a January New York Times story on the future of economics.

HIV/AIDS and Tumours


(1) Kaposi's Sarcoma

HIV/AIDS and Tumours (1) Kaposi's Sarcoma
Photo: Philippe Kestelyn

HIV/AIDS and the Eye Teaching Set 12/24

What If ... Your Lover Had HIV?


What if your significant other told you that they were infected with HIV or AIDS? What would you do? Would you stay in the relationship or would you leave? That is the question I've asked myself many times since learning that my best friend was infected by her fiancé.

She chose to stay for many reasons but the main reason she chose to stay was out of fear of loneliness. While I realize that many people remain in relationships for the wrong reasons, at some point you have to wonder if it's really worth it.

I want to share three stories with you about choices: The choice to stay; the choice to leave; and the choice not to reveal status.

Tia's Story: The choice to stay
Back in 1993 there wasn't enough information about HIV and AIDS for Tia to make an educated decision. At the request of her fiancé, she got tested. She tested positive but chose to stay even after she found out that they were in different stages of the virus. She battled with feelings of shame, fear, embarrassment and hopelessness.

AIDS affected couple weds in Karachi

Rubina Naz Weds Iqbal

This is the first time in history of Pakistan that two HIV/AIDS affected people have decided to marry and live a happy married life. Iqbal and Rubina Naz both are suffering with the deadly disease. Both bride and bridegroom are from Karachi.

Rubina’s first husband died 2 years ago with AIDS, while she was left behind suffering this deadly disease. Rubina has four children. Iqbal separated with his first wife four years back, he is also suffering from the same disease.

The families of both, Rubina and Iqbal, are happy on the couple’s decision of living a normal life. The newly wedded couple believes that their wedding will send a positive message to all those who are affected by HIV/AIDS. Rubina Naz is currently taking medical assistance from ARAA (Association for Rehabilitation of AIDS Affectees).

The wedding is being jointly financed by NGOs, Sindh AIDS Control Program and other Civil Society members. Their decision will prompt the people who are also suffering with this disease and will give them courage to face the life in a better way.